Tucker × Richard Werner: highlight «Rothschilds, JP Morgan, и One World Government»

Financial Historian Breaks Down the Rothschilds, JP Morgan, and the One World Government

Источник: https://tuckercarlson.com/richard-werner-highlights-2026

[Транскрипт]

Richard Werner [00:19:40] Yeah, that's exactly it. And that's where now I think it's good to go back again to the run-up to the First World War. What was the situation? It was a situation where we had one global hegemon, Britain, running the world. Half the world was formerly part of the British Empire, because not acquired through free and open elections, was it? So, military force at times extremely brutal. Colonial suppression for quite a long time. The greater part in the subcontinent in India run by a for-profit enterprise, the East India Company. So you had colonialism run by for- profit enterprise. It's not a good idea. It's very nice for people. The estimates vary of how many million Indians were killed under this rule by a full-profit company being in charge of a, you know, of, um, you know. Millions and millions of people. And, and actually the, the, the ruling elite in the East India company always had this view. Well, it's too many Indians. We don't really need that many Indians, horrible views out there, too many useless eaters. This is where, by the way, this whole overpopulation agenda that I'd like to talk to you about, um, came from, it goes back to the East India company, uh, because Malthus, who is this famous, you know, um. Economist, talking about overpopulation, he literally worked for the East India company. And it's known and there's many quotes of the East Indian company, people saying there's too many people, you know, we don't need all these, these Indians. But anyway, we'll come back to it. So that's a picture of the world. So that Britain, half the world directly under British control in a colonial regime that Glee benefit Britain, not the colonial subjects. To the same extent, many suffered and many died. That includes actually, of course, you know, one of the first colonies of Britain was Ireland. And you know there's the great Irish famine, the potato famine. Well, did you know that during the potato famine, Ireland produced potatoes and exported potatoes, exported potatoes to England while Irish people were starving. So it wasn't a lack of potatoes. It was policies that resulted in this famine. But anyway, there are too many Irish people. We have documents of British leaders saying that there's all these Irish people, we don't need so many Irish. So this is the background. Okay. So Britain in charge of the world. Now we had this development earlier on of a new economic power and political power in Europe, Prussia. Prussia was the first modern high growth economy and it was quite breathtaking. It was high growth and prosperity for the majority of the people. It was capitalism, but it was capitalism for kind where the idea was we wanted to be sustainable capitalism in the sense that we don't want to have mass poverty at the same time. We don't this K shaped economy where the elite is doing really well, but the majority. Of the people are not doing well. That's, and I think it's perfectly rational to say that that's not really a great system. Because you storing up trouble for the future. Right. Yes. You know, if the majority is actually not benefiting and it is, you know, and you have increasingly democratic structures, then at some stage, something will change, right? Yes. So you want to avoid it. And they did it very early on. So the first modern sort of social security legislation was done in Prussia. Also, of course, the first investment in public schools, properly public schools and kindergartens and universities was in Prusia. It was a very modern state, highly successful. The middle class was thriving, it was merit-based, you could move up the ladder. Um, if you put in your energy and your efforts, it will be rewarded, very successful economy based of course, also on the system of decentralization, local decision-making, and especially many small local banks lending to small firms. Now, Prussia then morphed into Germany in 1871. Yes. The unification, which is another, um, or partial unification. Cause of course, many German states were left out, such as Austria, um. Under international, um sort of, um influence, but also Prussia felt Austria was a rival and so on. I mean, there's this, that's for another show. There's, there're a lot of interesting stuff happening there. Um, but The principles were also applied in now Imperial Germany under essentially Prussian leadership. And again, Imperial Germany was highly successful. Economic growth just in the beginning of the 20th century was very high. It was a high growth economy again, and people benefited, prosperity, the middle class. It was quite impressive, the city's beautiful, massive public investment. Railway network schools, universities, science, you know, this is the beginning of science being German dominated. In the first half of the 20th century, the majority of scientific publications were in German and all the leading research was in these publications. That was where things were happening and other countries were following, were looking at this model. Now, the place that didn't like that was the hegemon of the world Britain. That clearly was, from their viewpoint, a rival being built up and growing. It is one thing to start to lose market share because Britain used to be the number one economic power, industrial revolution, and you know, mass production really happened first in Britain and then spread from there, um, to other countries of Britain was in the sequence chronology of economic development was number one, but then soon after Germany came in, of course, also at the same time, America also rose, um as a emerging economy, high growth economy as well as I'll forget that. So, but of course America is further away and was for international documents using English. So I suppose the British felt less immediately threatened by America. Germany is very close and the decision was made, we've got to do something about this, but a key turning point in this, in really resolving the British goals and creating this conviction that war has to be made on Germany was the following development. So British power was projected across the globe through, through the seas, the oceans, the Navy, because it was a global empire, you know, from Britain to Australia and, and, you now, many parts of the world shipping was of course, very important and control of the seas was important and that was, it was in British hands, so no doubt about that. Nobody could even come close to. Um, the numbers of ships and British naval dominance, but then something else happened, um, that was felt as a, as a huge threat, Germany developed this plan in working on the continent. It was a continental power and we have this conflict between the sort of sea power and the continental power. Now Germany made plans to, I mean, it's quite natural to improve its access to resources. You know Germany Didn't they really have many resources? It has coal, um, for the steel industry, you know, has it had some input, but it still needed other raw materials and inputs from, from across the globe. So how do you get that? If it's via the seas, then essentially it's beholden to the British can be blackmailed by the British as actually happened demonstrated in 1919, you know, the first world war in Germany was over in 1918. And when the armistice was signed and Germany, I mean, German leaders have always been slightly on the naive side believing, okay, that's an armistis. That's that. The first world war is ended. Germany wasn't defeated. No foreign troops on German territory yet. And, and it disbanded his army and his Navy. Right. But the British of course, didn't disband their army and Navy. And they then staged a naval blockade of Germany. Suddenly shipping was entirely cut off. As a result, one million, it's estimated around one million Germans starved to death in the famine of 1919, which was engineered by the British, just to illustrate the reality when you're beholden to a sea power that controls the seas for your inputs. And so on the one hand, Germany had been aware of that risk, and it was working on alternatives. And on the other hand, Britain had adopted countermeasures. What were the countermeasure? So around a million Germans. Yeah, in 1919. And of course, Britain continued to fight on British cenotaphs of the First World War. Often in the countryside, you see the First world war defined as 1914 to 1919. Because you know dead bodies were still arriving the villages you couldn't tell the the pastor no right 1918 on the Senate of while we were still at you know our fallen coming you know and then the villages recording that the deaths in 1919. So. Now, this, what really changed things was around 1900, the German plan to improve its raw material resource access, to avoid these issues that unfortunately could not be in the end, avoid it, but not to be beholden. It was trying not to, be in a situation where it's blackmailed by Britain through the seas, namely to have a continental transport system. And this plan was developed by on the investment side and the engineering side Siemens, major German engineering company and funded by Deutsche Bank, namely the plan to build the Berlin-Baghdad-Bazra railway. Via Istanbul, Ottoman Empire was already an ally. And so it's quite natural to gain access to the Gulf area and oil, which was beginning to be clearly an important resource. And so they started building that railway, the Berlin-Baghdad-Basra railway. That's when the British colonial and empire planners decided this really has to be stopped. Because had that been built in time completed, then it would have rendered essentially the British naval dominance irrelevant because you can transport energy resources, raw materials. You can sell your high value added output to actually the British Empire, Middle East or India to the rest of the world. You can ship through your own railway network without British interference. Um So the British planners decided this cannot be allowed. This has to be stopped by all means, including war. And it was a key factor in the run-up to the first world war. Of course, there were other factors. Um, the German government became increasingly internationally critical of British, um, warfare across the globe. For example, um you know, in, in South Africa, yes. Um, Britain made war on the farmers, the German and low-country Dutch farmers that had settled centuries earlier in South Africa. Created the world's first concentration camps. Indeed, indeed. That was a British invention. There were three farmer wars. Farmer, bower in German, in Dutch, bauer, bouwer. The three bower wars, the farmer wars, because literally the world number one military power made war on farmers to control this country, this area, why, well. It was of strategic relevance, but also oil, sorry, not other sources, gold and diamonds were found there and, um, London was very keen to have those. Um, actually surprisingly, the farmers were so well organized. They won the first farmer's war and the second bar war. And then they had to use the Britain had to use the usual devious techniques. Um, to win the third one, murdering women and children in concentration camps. Yes. And so, and the Kaiser, the German leadership criticized the British intervention. And so Britain also, I mean, these are other reasons. What future British prime minister fought in that war? Yes. Well, Churchill had a role there and writes about it in his, I think he even got captured. He didn't get captured and was treated well enough to escape alive, which wasn't really true for people in the concentration camps necessarily. So, yes, now, so there were other factors, no doubt, but. It's clear when you look at the old documents that anti-German sentiments whipped up as soon as there were early plans for this railway. It didn't come from Norway. It was discussed already in the late 1880s, 1890s, and then became a proper investment project at the end of the 19th century and, you know, 1900s onwards. And of course, the First World War succeeded in stopping that. Now... Also, just another point before we look at what this means for today, what are the lessons for today? The first world war itself was of course, quite devastating for Germany. Um, also for all the other countries involved, uh, the number of people killed in the war, it was just horrendous, huge waste of, um, yeah, of lives and resources, very, very sad. Also Germany, then in the Versailles treaty, after the starvation of 1919 this is meant to soften up Germany and then impose the Versailles, you know, um, strange rules on Germany. The Germany would be taken apart. One quarter of Germany would lost and given to other countries. Uh, lots of Germans, millions of Germans would now live in a new countries, newly created by the British, such as Czechoslovakia and so on. And, and so, you now, there's a lot of hardship followed this. Despite that, they couldn't essentially change the fact that Germany was still scientifically leader engineering in terms of engineering and production was a leader in the world and was still a rival of of Britain. Because the education system also hadn't really been destroyed. And so, you know, a second round was needed. Another world war was needed and for this, interestingly, a lot of investment took place in Germany in the 1920s that allowed a quick revival. And of course, there's other issues, how Hitler came to power. If we have time, we should talk about how did he actually come to power? When you look at money and banking and central banking, you get some interesting new insights. Thanks. So, We also had investment in Germany, particularly by America, American companies, ITT, General Motors, Ford, and then also banking, Brown Brothers, Harriman, where Prescott Bush from the Bush family was active, supporting Germany. Now, something very similar is happening or has been happening in recent decades. Of course, the post-second World War global hegemon is America. It's taken on that leadership role from Britain, originally, even with its own colonies, I mean, there'd been American colonies, whether the Philippines or other places. Um, and it's adopted the key policies and policy tools from Britain. So. Which country is the new Germany that is a rival to America? Well, it's China and China has been working on ensuring its supply of raw material inputs in the last, particularly in the last 15 years. So in many ways it's a sort of new strategy, but it is very much the same situation as Germany was in it. It didn't want to be beholden to shipping under British control, could be blackmailed. Of course, America is dominating the seas and China doesn't want be beholden to America and that includes of course the Strait of Hormuz. It also includes the Strait of Malacca where even more Chinese trade goes through. That's another of these potential choke points as they call it, where they can choke China. So China's been working on alternative routes. What is the modern Berlin Baghdad Railway? Well, it is the Belt Road Initiative, which is the Chinese president Xi Jinping's really landmark Um, milestone foreign policy initiative started, um, 11 years ago. On the one hand, it offers an interesting alternative to participating countries, many developing countries to the IMF world bank system that I hope we have, we have time to discuss because that system has been designed to keep developing countries. From developing to prevent development and to keep them poor, but effective, cheap exporters of raw materials, according to the British colonial model. So it's like the modern version of the colonial British empire is this American dominated IMF World Bank rule and the Belt and Road Initiative on the one hand is an, is alternative that can be offered to countries and many countries, including in Africa have joined this for this reason.